Prompt_D4_ProgEval_Spg11


 * This online discussion STARTS February 15, Tuesday (gave you a day off for Valentine’s Day) and ENDS February 21, Monday. Initial posts should be completed by Thhursday, February 17. **


 * Objectives**

• Differentiate system approach, systems approach, systematic approach, and systemic approach • Discuss the steps for evaluating alignment of the three levels of results (Mega, Macro, Micro) • Identify strengths and weaknesses in evaluation within an organization • Discuss the linkage between evaluation and decision making • Discuss considerations in writing measurable objectives • Discuss considerations in developing a set of specific evaluation questions • Differentiate value and values • Differentiate means and ends • Discuss rules for evaluation alignment and direction

1. First initial post includes examples of intended results. The examples may be related to the program you are evaluating, another program, or even fictitious. Give an example of an intended result at each of the three levels of results --- Mega, Macro, and Micro. Next, give an example of the current result at each of the three levels.


 * Note: This discussion question is based on the Conceptual Guide for Evaluating Alignment (see page 56 in your textbook.) **

2. Second initial post includes your answer to the questions below based on your first initial post.

a. What are the gaps between the intended and current results?

b. What means may have been effective or ineffective in reaching the intended results?

3. You are expected to actively interact and respond to your peers’ postings. You can do this by using the following interactive strategies ---

• Sharing additional evidence that support the position stated by another student (A) • Giving an example of the concept being discussed (B) • Asking for clarification (C) • Restating a position in different words (D) • Introducing a nuance that enriches the original formulation (E) • Offering a different opinion (F)

You are expected to do one of each response strategy. Make sure you change the subject heading to reflect your last name and the designated letter (e.g., Baylen-A for a response using a "sharing additional evidence that support the position stated by another student")

4. Finally, post a third initial post about the status of your evaluation project. Where are you in the process? What issues have you encountered as you finalize your evaluation plan? What have you learned so far?